Qualitative Inquiry

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Flyvbjerg, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Qualitative Inquiry, Vol. 12, No. 2, 219-245 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1077800405284363
© 2006 SAGE Publications

Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research

Bent Flyvbjerg

Aalborg University, Denmark

This article examines five common misunderstandings about case-study research: (a) theoretical knowledge is more valuable than practical knowledge; (b) one cannot generalize from a single case, therefore, the single-case study cannot contribute to scientific development; (c) the case study is most useful for generating hypotheses, whereas other methods are more suitable for hypotheses testing and theory building; (d) the case study contains a bias toward verification; and (e) it is often difficult to summarize specific case studies. This article explains and corrects these misunderstandings one by one and concludes with the Kuhnian insight that a scientific discipline without a large number of thoroughly executed case studies is a discipline without systematic production of exemplars, and a discipline without exemplars is an ineffective one. Social science may be strengthened by the execution of a greater number of good case studies.

Key Words: case study • case selection • critical cases • validity in case studies


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clinical Case StudiesHome page
M. Miyahara, T. Leeder, G. Francis, and A. Inghelbrecht
Does an Instruction of a Verbal Labeling Strategy for Hand Movements Improve General Motor Coordination as Well as the Gestural Performance?: A Test of the Relationship Between Developmental Coordination Disorder and Dyspraxia
Clinical Case Studies, June 1, 2008; 7(3): 191 - 207.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Information ScienceHome page
J. M. Berryman
Judgements during information seeking: a naturalistic approach to understanding the assessment of enough information
Journal of Information Science, April 1, 2008; 34(2): 196 - 206.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Review of Administrative SciencesHome page
J. Askim
How do politicians use performance information? An analysis of the Norwegian local government experience
International Review of Administrative Sciences, September 1, 2007; 73(3): 453 - 472.
[Abstract] [PDF]