|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Common Insights, Differing Methodologies: Toward a Fusion of Indigenous Methodologies, Participatory Action Research, and White Studies in an Urban Aboriginal Research Agenda
Mike Evans1*,
Rachelle Hole2,
Lawrence D. Berg3,
Peter Hutchinson4,
and
Dixon Sookraj5
1 Community, Cultural, and Global Studies, University of British Columbia
2 School of Social Work, University of British Columbia Okanagan
3 Community, Culture and Global Studies, University of British Columbia Okanagan
4 Faculty of Health and Social Development, University of British Columbia Okanagan
5 School of Social Work; University of British Columbia Okanagan
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mike.evans{at}ubc.ca.
 |
Abstract |
|---|
In this article, we discuss three broad research approaches: indigenous methodologies, participatory action research, and White studies. We suggest that a fusion of these three approaches can be useful, especially in terms of collaborative work with indigenous communities. More specifically, we argue that using indigenous methodologies and participatory action research, but refocusing the object of inquiry directly and specifically on the institutions and structures that indigenous peoples face, can be a particularly effective way of transforming indigenous peoples from the objects of inquiry to its authors. A case study focused on the development of appropriate research methods for a collaborative project with the urban aboriginal communities of the Okanagan Valley in British Columbia, Canada, provides an illustration of the methodological fusion we propose.
First published on March 23, 2009, doi:10.1177/1077800409333392
Qualitative Inquiry 2009;15:893.
A more recent version of this article appeared on May 1, 2009

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
|
|