This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1077800408330418v1 15/5/859    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Possick, C. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Reflexive Positioning in a Politically Sensitive Situation: Dealing With the Threats of Researching the West Bank Settler Experience

The Academic College of Judea and Samaria

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: chayap{at}ariel.ac.il.

	Abstract

For the past 7 years, the author has conducted qualitative research projects revolving around the experiences of West Bank settlers. The political situation in Israel in general, and the West Bank in particular, has undergone rapid and dramatic political, military, and social changes during this period. In highly politically sensitive situations such as this, the researcher is faced with physical, professional, emotional, and ethical threats. This article presents a conceptual discussion and case illustration of the use of four types of reflexive positioning: (a) identification with respondents, (b) emotional enmeshment, (c) personal associations, and (d) auto-ethnography. These reflexive positions reduce risks to the trustworthiness of the research and transform threats into opportunities to enrich qualitative data analysis.

First published on January 22, 2009, doi:10.1177/1077800408330418

Qualitative Inquiry 2009;15:859.

A more recent version of this article appeared on May 1, 2009


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?