Qualitative Inquiry

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1077800407312041v1
14/2/285    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Linnell, S.
Right arrow Articles by Gannon, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
First published on January 25, 2008, doi:10.1177/1077800407312041

Qualitative Inquiry 2008;14:285.

A more recent version of this article appeared on March 1, 2008


Article

Precarious Listening

Sheridan Linnell, Peter Bansel, Constance Ellwood, and Susanne Gannon*

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: s.gannon{at}uws.edu.au.


   Abstract
This article attempts to hold thought open in a textual space that often forecloses thought. The authors present arguments but work them through poetry, memoir, pictures, and exposition. They frame this work in particular as an improvisation around—and intervention into—more familiar practices of collective biography, narrative, and art therapies and situate it as a new pedagogy for collective academic practice. The article emerged from a project in which the authors produced an aesthetic practice and attempted an ethics of listening while recognizing that academic experiences more often venerate speech. The authors write a collective text but sit apart within it as well as together, thus emphasizing singularity and collectivity, locatedness and the body. They take their work and themselves within that work as precarious, tentative, and uncertain and are concerned to ask questions that might keep thought open rather than provide answers.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?