Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Qualitative Inquiry
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brinkmann, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Could Interviews Be Epistemic?

An Alternative to Qualitative Opinion Polling

Svend Brinkmann

University of Aarhus, Denmark

The author explores using qualitative research interviews to gain knowledge rather than mere opinions about a given topic. Current interviews typically aim to probe the respondents' experiences and opinions—doxa in Greek. An implicit model for much doxastic interviewing is client-centered therapy, in which the respondent—client is the only authority concerning his or her experiences and opinions. The author argues that doxastic interviews do not take advantage of the knowledge-producing potentials inherent in human conversations. Instead, the author examines the Socratic dialogue as an interview form that addresses not opinions but knowledge (episteme). In epistemic interviewing, both parties are engaged in dialectically examining a topic, with the aim of gaining knowledge in a normative—epistemic sense. The author presents examples from different interview studies that illustrate the epistemic interview in practice. Finally, the author asks whether epistemic interviews are suitable only for "elite interviews" and whether they are particularly ethically problematic.

Key Words: interview • qualitative research • epistemic interviewing • knowledge

References

  • Aristotle. (1976). Nichomachean ethics. London: Penguin.
  • Atkinson, P., & Silverman, D. (1997). Kundera's immortality: The interview society and the invention of the self. Qualitative Inquiry, 3(3), 304-325.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Bellah, R.N., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W.M., Swidler, A., & Tipton, S.M. (1985). Habits of the heart: Individualism and commitment in American life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Bourdieu, P., et al. (1999). The weight of the world: Social su fering in contemporary society. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Briggs, C.L. (2003). Interviewing, power/knowledge, and social inequality. In J. A. Holstein & J. F. Gubrium (Eds.), Inside interviewing: New lenses, new concerns (pp. 495-506). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Brinkmann, S. (2006). Mental life in the space of reasons. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 36(1), 1-16.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Brinkmann, S., & Kvale, S. (2005). Confronting the ethics of qualitative research. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 18(2), 157-181.
  • Butler, J. (2005). Giving an account of oneself. New York: Fordham University Press.
  • Coulter, J. (1979). The social construction of mind: Studies in ethnomethodology and linguistic philosophy. London: Macmillan.
  • Denzin, N.K. (2001). The reflexive interview and a performative social science. Qualitative Research, 1(1), 23-46.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2005). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Dinkins, C.S. (2005). Shared inquiry: Socratic-hermeneutic interpre-viewing. In P. Ironside (Ed.), Beyond method: Philosophical conversations in healthcare research and scholarship (pp. 111-147). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
  • Duncombe, J., & Jessop, J. (2002). "Doing rapport" and the ethics of "faking friendship." In M. Mauther, M. Birch, J. Jessop, & T. Miller (Eds.), Ethics in qualitative research (pp. 107-122). London: Sage.
  • Ellis, C., & Berger, L. (2003). Their story/my story/our story: Including the researcher's experience in interview research. In J. A. Holstein & J. F. Gubrium (Eds.), Inside interviewing: New lenses, new concerns (pp. 467-493). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social science matter—Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Fontana, A., & Frey, J.H. (2005). The interview: From neutral stance to political involvement. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 695-727). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Foucault, M. (2001). Fearless speech ( J. Pearson, Ed.). New York: Semiotext(e).
  • Furedi, F. (2004). Therapy culture: Cultivating vulnerability in an uncertain age. London: Routledge.
  • Gadamer, H.G. (1960). Truth and method. New York: Continuum.
  • Giorgi, A., & Giorgi, B. (2003). The descriptive phenomenological psychological method. In P. M. Camic, J. E. Rhodes, & L. Yardley (Eds.), Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design (pp. 243-273). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Glesne, C., & Peshkin, A. (1992). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction. New York: Longman.
  • Hollway, W., & Jefferson, T. (2000). Biography, anxiety and the experience of locality. In P. Chamberlayne, J. Bornat, & T. Wengraf (Eds.), The turn to biographical methods in social science (pp. 167-180). London: Routledge.
  • Holstein, J.A., & Gubrium, J.F. (1995). The active interview. London: Sage.
  • Holstein, J.A., & Gubrium, J.F. (2003). Inside interviewing: New lenses, new concerns. In J. A. Holstein & J. F. Gubrium (Eds.), Inside interviewing: New lenses, new concerns (pp. 3-30). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Kvale, S. (1996). InterViews—An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Kvale, S. (2003). The psychoanalytic interview as inspiration for qualitative research. In P. M. Camic, J. E. Rhodes, & L. Yardley (Eds.), Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design (pp. 275-297). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Kvale, S. (2006). Dominance through interviews and dialogues. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(3), 480-500.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Løgstrup, K.E. (1997). The ethical demand. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press. (Original work published 1956)
  • MacIntyre, A. (1985). After virtue (2nd ed.). London: Duckworth.
  • Plato. (1987). The republic. London: Penguin.
  • Rogers, C. (1945). The non-directive method as a technique for social research. American Journal of Sociology, 50(4), 279-283.[CrossRef]
  • Rose, N. (1999). Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self (2nd ed.). London: Free Association.
  • Schulze, G. (1992). Die erlebnisgesellschaft: Kultursoziologie der gegenwart [The experience society: A cultural sociology of contemporary society]. Frankfurt, Germany: Campus.
  • Sellars, W. (1997). Empiricism and the philosophy of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1956)
  • Sennett, R. (2003). The fall of public man. London: Penguin. (Original work published 1977)
  • Skjervheim, H. (1957). Deltaker og tilskodar [Participant and spectator]. Oslo, Norway: Oslo University Press.
  • Strawson, P.F. (1974). Freedom and resentment and other essays. London: Methuen.
  • Tanggaard, L. (2007a). Dialogue and disobedience in research interviewing. Manuscript in preparation.
  • Tanggaard, L. (2007b). The research interview as discourses crossing swords. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(1), 160-176.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.

Qualitative Inquiry, Vol. 13, No. 8, 1116-1138 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1077800407308222


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brinkmann, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?