This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Koro-Ljungberg, M. Articles by Kmiec, C. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Technologies of Normalization and Self

Thinking About IRBs and Extrinsic Research Ethics With Foucault

University of Florida

Marco Gemignani

Duquesne University

Cheri Winton Brodeur

University of Florida

Cheryl Kmiec

University of Florida

In this article, the authors discuss the technologies of normalization and self in relation to ethics and the problematization of extrinsic research ethics. They argue that institutional review boards (IRBs) and other similar institutional mechanisms promote extrinsic forms of ethics that are exemplified through institutionalized structures such as (a) the Belmont Report, (b) IRB protocol, (c) informed consent, and (d) localized interpretations of IRB rules and regulations. However, at the same time, institutional normalization enables researchers and participants to construct themselves as ethically responsible participants through resistance and critical reflection. Such "care of the self" and critical awareness of dominant discourses and regimes of power and knowledge are essential to the development and practice of research that is ethical, free, and responsive. Finally, the authors conclude that the discussions about researchers' ethical decision making and freedom of choice need to be separate from discussions related to researchers' compliance, duties, and institutional responsibilities.

Key Words: normalization • IRB • ethics • Foucault

References

• Christians, C. (2005). Ethics and politics in qualitative research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 139-164). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Deleuze, G. (1988). Foucault. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota. (Original work published 1986)
• Denzin, N.K. (1997). Interpretive ethnography. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Denzin, N.K. (2003). Performance ethnography: Critical pedagogy and the politics of culture. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Dougherty, D., & Atkinson, J. (2006). Competing ethical communities and a researcher's dilemma: The case of a sexual harasser. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 292-315.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Erbert, L.A., Mearns, G.M., & Dena, S. (2005). Perceptions of turning points and dialectical interpretations in organizational team development. Small Group Research, 36(1), 21-58.[Abstract]
• Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977. (L. M. C. Cordon, J. Mepham, & K. Soper, Trans.; C. Cordon, Ed.). New York: Pantheon.
• Foucault, M. (1984). Foucault reader. New York: Pantheon.
• Foucault, M. (1987). The history of sexuality: The use of pleasure (Vol. 2). London: Penguin.
• Foucault, M. (1988). Politics, philosophy, culture: Interviews and other writings of Michel Foucault, 1977-1984. New York: Routledge.
• Foucault, M. (1990). The use of pleasure: Volume two of the history of sexuality. New York: Vintage. (Original work published 1984)
• Foucault, M. (1994a). The ethics of the concern for self as a practice of freedom. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), Ethics: Subjectivity and truth (pp. 281-302). New York: New Press. (Original work published 1984)
• Foucault, M. (1994b). Ethics, subjectivity and truth: Essential works of Foucault 1964-1984 (R. Hurley et al., Trans.; P. Rainbow, Ed.). New York: New Press.
• Foucault, M. (1994c). On the geneaology of ethics. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), Ethics: Subjectivity and truth (pp. 253-280). New York: New Press.
• Foucault, M. (1994d). Technologies of the self. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), Ethics: Subjectivity and truth (pp. 223-252). New York: New Press. (Original work published 1982)
• Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and punish. New York: Vintage. (Original work published 1977)
• Foucault, M. (2003). Abnormal: Lectures at the College de France, 1974-1975. New York: Picador. (Original work published 1999)
• Foucault, M., Burchell, G., Gordon, C., & Miller, P. (1991). The Foucault e fect: Studies in governmentality: With two lectures by and an interview with Michel Foucault. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Frank, A., & Jones, T. (2003). Bioethics and the later Foucault. Journal of Medical Humanities, 24(3/4), 179-186.[CrossRef]
• Gubrium, E., & Koro-Ljungberg, M. (2005). Contending with border making in the social constructionist interview. Qualitative Inquiry, 11(5), 689-715.[Abstract]
• Han, B. ( 2002). Foucault's critical project: Between the transcendental and the historical. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. (Original work published 1998 )
• Infinito, J. (2003). Ethical self-formation: A look at the later Foucault. Educational Theory, 53(2), 155-171.[CrossRef]
• Lacombe, D. (1996). Reforming Foucault: A critique of the social control thesis. British Journal of Sociology, 47(2), 332-352.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Lather, P. (2004). This is your father's paradigm: Government intrusion and the case of qualitative research in education. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(1), 15-34.[Abstract]
• Lincoln, Y.S., & Tierney, W.G. (2004). Qualitative research and institutional review board. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 219-234.[Abstract]
• Madison, D.S. (2005). Critical ethnography: Method, ethics, and performance. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• McNamee, M. (2002). Introduction: Whose ethics, which research? In M. McNamee & D. Bridges (Eds.), The ethics of educational research (pp. 1-21). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
• National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1979). Belmont report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Retrieved May 26, 2006, from http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/belmont.html
• Nelson, C. (2004). The brave new world of research surveillance. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 207-218.[Abstract]
• Scott, C. (1990). The question of ethics: Nietzsche, Foucault, Heidegger. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
• Small, R. (2002). Codes are not enough: What philosophy can contribute to the ethics of educational research. In M. McNamee & D. Bridges (Eds.), The ethics of educational research (pp. 89-110). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
• Smart, B. (1991). On the subjects of sexuality, ethics, and politics in the work of Foucault. Boundary 2, 18(1), 201-225.
• University of Florida, Health Science Center. ( 2005). Institutional review board (IRB-01) policies & procedures manual. Retrieved June 1, 2006, from http://irb.ufl.edu/docs/irb01ppmanual.doc
• Wright, D. (2004). Creative nonfiction and the academy: A cautionary tale. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 202-206.[Abstract]

Qualitative Inquiry, Vol. 13, No. 8, 1075-1094 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1077800407308822


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Koro-Ljungberg, M. Articles by Kmiec, C. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?