Qualitative Inquiry

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eryaman, M. Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Qualitative Inquiry, Vol. 12, No. 6, 1198-1219 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1077800405276773

Traveling Beyond Dangerous Private and Universal Discourses

Radioactivity of Radical Hermeneutics and Objectivism in Educational Research

Mustafa Yunus Eryaman

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

In this article, the author explores several definitions of reading and evaluating educational research texts without finding deep private meanings or developing objective, scientific, and instrumental norms for evaluating quality of educational research studies. Among these descriptions, the author emphasizes Gadamer's weak poststructural model and Habermas's critique of and contribution to it, aiming to replace the neoconservative objectivist and neoliberal subjectivist traditions with something of greater social and intellectual utility: a "dialectical and critical" theory of reading and evaluation of educational research. This alternative approach, based on philosophical hermeneutics, critical theory, and practical philosophy, identifies understanding, interpreting, and evaluating a research text as a political, ideological, ethical, critical, gendered, sexual, racial, transformative, social, discursive, deliberative, and performed experience. The author argues that knowledge developed from this alternative approach represents a step toward the development of transformative political practices and progressive institutions to challenge the neoconservative status quo at intellectual, political, and practical levels.

Key Words: radical hermeneutics • critical theory • No Child Left Behind • NCLB • National Research Council • NRC report • practical philosophy

References

  • Bernstein, R. J. (1983). Beyond objectivism and relativism. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
  • Carr, W. (1995). What is an educational practice? In W. Carr (Ed.), For education (pp. 60-73). Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.
  • Carr, W. (1997). Philosophy and method in educational research. Cambridge Journal of Education, 27(2), 203-209.
  • Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power, and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
  • deMarrais, K. (2004). Elegant communications: Sharing qualitative research with communities, colleagues, and critics. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 281-297.[Abstract]
  • Denzin, N. K. (2005). Homegrown democracy, homegrown democrats. International Journal of Progressive Education, 1(1), 45-49.
  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
  • Dewey, J. (1927). The role of philosophy in the history of civilization. The Philosophical Review, 36(1), 1-9.[CrossRef]
  • Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Macmillan.
  • Erickson, F., & Gutierrez, K. (2002). Culture, rigor, and science in educational research. Educational Researcher, 31(8), 21-24.
  • Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
  • Gadamer, H-G. (1989). Truth and method (2nd rev. ed.) (J. Weinsheimer & D. G. Marshall, Trans.). New York: Crossroad.
  • Gee, J. P. (2005). It's theories all the way down: A response to scientific research in education. Teachers College Record, 107(1), 10-18.[CrossRef]
  • Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks (Q. Hoare & G. Nowell-Smith, Eds. & Trans.). New York: International Publishers.
  • Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action, Vol. 1 (T. McCarthy, Trans.). Boston: Beacon Press.
  • Habermas, J. (1987). The philosophical discourse of modernity (F. G. Lawrence, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Habermas, J. (1988a). On the logic of the social sciences (S. W. Nicholson & J. A. Stark, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Habermas, J. (1988b). The theory of communicative action, Vol. 2 (T. McCarthy, Trans.). Boston: Beacon Press.
  • Herrnstein, R., & Murray, C. (1994). The bell curve: Intelligence and class structure in American life. New York: Free Press.
  • Hollinger, R. (1998). From Weber to Habermas. In E. D. Klemke, R. Hollinger, & A. D. Kline (Eds.), Introductory readings in the philosophy of science (pp. 416-425). Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.
  • Kessels, J.P.A.M., & Korthagen, F.A.J. (1996). The relationship between theory and practice: Back to the classics. Educational Researcher, 23, 17-22.[CrossRef]
  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Cannella, G. S. (Eds.). (2004a). Dangerous discourses: Methodological conservatism and governmental regimes of truth [Special issue]. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(1), 5-14.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Cannella, G. S. (2004b). Qualitative research, power, and the radical right. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 175-201.[Abstract]
  • Marx, K. (1845). Theses on Feuerbach. Retrieved September 10, 2006, from http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1845/theses/index.htm
  • National Research Council. (2002). Scientific research in education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. I, No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425. 25-27 (2002).
  • Oakes, J., & Lipton, M. (2003). Teaching to change the world. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
  • Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, irony, and solidarity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rorty, R. (1998). Truth and progress: Philosophical papers III. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sanderson, I. (2003). Is it "what works" that matters? Evaluation and evidence based policy making. Research Papers in Education Policy and Practice, 18(4), 331–347.
  • Schwandt, T. A. (1994). Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to human inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 118-137). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Schwandt, T. A. (1996). Farewell to criteriology. Qualitative Inquiry, 2(1), 58-72.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Schwandt, T. A. (2002). Evaluation practices reconsidered. New York: Peter Lang.
  • Schwandt, T. A. (2005). A diagnostic reading of scientifically based research for education. Educational Theory, 55(3), 285-305.[CrossRef]
  • Slavin, R. E., & Cheung, A. (2003). Effective programs for English language learners: A bestevidence synthesis. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University, CRESPAR.
  • St. Pierre, E. A. (2002). Science rejects postmodernism. Educational Researcher, 31(8), 25-27.
  • Taylor, C. (2002). Gadamer on the human sciences. In R. J. Dostal (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Gadamer (pp. 126-142). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Thomas, W., & Collier, V. (2002). A national study of school effectiveness for language minority students' long-term academic achievement. Santa Cruz, CA, and Washington, DC: Center for Research on Education, Diversity & Excellence. Retrieved from http://www.crede.ucsc.edu/research/llaa/1.1_final.html
  • Wagenaar, H., & Cook, N.S.D. (2003). Understanding policy practices: Action, dialectic and deliberation in policy analysis. In M. Hajer & H. Wagenaar (Eds.), Deliberative policy analysis: Understanding governance in the network society (pp. 139-171). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Waite, G. (2004). Radio Nietzsche, or, how to fall short of philosophy. In B. Krajewski (Ed.), Gadamer's repercussions: Reconsidering philosophical hermeneutics (pp. 169-211). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  • Warnke, G. (2002). Hermeneutics, ethics, and politics. In R. J. Dostal (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Gadamer (pp. 79-101). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Warnke, G. (2004). Literature, law, and morality. In B. Krajewski (Ed.), Gadamer's repercussions: Reconsidering philosophical hermeneutics(pp. 82-102). California: University of California Press.
  • Weinsheimer, J. (2004). Meaningless hermeneutics? In B. Krajewski (Ed.), Gadamer's repercussions: Reconsidering philosophical hermeneutics(pp. 158-168). California: University of California Press.
  • Wright, W. (2005). Evolution of federal policy and implications of No Child Left Behind for language minority students[Policy brief]. Tempe: Arizona State University.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eryaman, M. Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?