|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Qualitative Inquiry, Vol. 12, No. 6,
1160-1179 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1077800406293236
Conversational Space and Participant Shame in Interviewing
Erica Owens
West Virginia University, Morgantown
In this article, the author presents a "failed" interview that seemingly provided no usable data. The audiotape segments of participant talk were nearly inaudible and most of the interview could not be transcribed. Upon repeated readings of salvageable fragments, however, a pattern of silencing became noticeable. The author suggests that participant silence is a collaboratively produced constraint stemming from an unsuccessful subtextual negotiation about the linguistic environment of the interview. She explores the phenomenon of participant shame and the role of the researcher in expanding conversational space to allow for the expression of shameful storylines. Current notions of what is "sensitive" research unduly limit researcher's understandings of the collaborative and fragile nature of the interview setting. Research on any topic may turn sensitive if the participant's story includes elements that are potentially distressing and necessary to the storyline. Means for recognizing and accommodating participant shame during the interview process are suggested.
Key Words: shame • interviewing • qualitative methods • research • sensitive topics
References
- Brznzy, S., Ault, A., & Segal, E. A. (1997). Conducting qualitative interviews with women survivors of trauma. Affilia, 12(1), 76-83.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Ceglowski, D. (2000). Research as relationship. Qualitative Inquiry, 6(1), 88-103.[Abstract]
- Cohler, B. J. (2001). New directions in the study of personal narratives: Discussion of articles studying narratives of close relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 18(5), 731-743.[Free Full Text]
- Edelmann, R. J., Asendorf, J., Contarello, A., & Zammuner, V. (1989). Self-reported expression of embarrassment in five European cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 20, 357-371.[Abstract]
- Gilbert, P. (2003). Evolution, social roles, and the differences in shame and guilt. Social Research, 70(4), 1205-1230.
- Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
- Heller, A. (2003). Five approaches to the phenomenon of shame. Social Research, 70(4), 1015-1030.
- Hollander, J. (2003). Honor dishonorable: Shameful shame. Social Research, 70(4), 1061-1074.
- Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F. (2000). The self we live by: Narrative identity in a postmodern world. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Jansen, G. G., & Davis, D. R. (1998). Honoring voice and visibility: Sensitive-topic research and feminist interpretive inquiry. Affilia: Journal of Women and Social Work, 13(3), 289-311.[CrossRef][ISI]
- Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Lewis, M. (2003). The role of the self in shame. Social Research, 70(4), 1181-1204.
- Retzinger, S. M. (1995). Identifying shame and anger in discourse. American Behavioral Scientist, 38(8), 1104-1113.[Free Full Text]
- Richardson, L. (1997). Fields of play: Constructing an academic life. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
- Riessman, C. K. (1990). Divorce talk: Women and men make sense of personal relationships. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
- Riessman, C. K. (1993). Narrative analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
- Scheff, T. (1988). Shame and conformity: The deference-emotion system. American Sociological Review, 53(3), 395-406.[CrossRef]
- Shalhoub-Kevorkian, N. (2001). Using the dialogue tent to break mental chains: Listening and being heard. Social Science Review, 75(1), 135-150.
- Shapiro, D. (2003). The tortured, not the torturers, are ashamed. Social Research, 70(4), 1131-1148.
- Sleutel, M. R. (1998). Women's experiences of abuse: A review of qualitative research. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 19(6), 525-539.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Vaughan, D. (1986). Uncoupling: Turning points in intimate relationships. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Wood, G. G., & Roche, S. E. (2001). An emancipatory principle for social work with survivors of male violence. Affilia: Journal of Women and Social Work, 16(1), 66-79.[CrossRef]
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
S. M. Carter, C. F. C. Jordens, C. McGrath, and M. Little
You Have to Make Something of All That Rubbish, Do You? An Empirical Investigation of the Social Process of Qualitative Research
Qual Health Res,
September 1, 2008;
18(9):
1264 - 1276.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
