Qualitative Inquiry

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Corbin, J.
Right arrow Articles by Morse, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Qualitative Inquiry, Vol. 9, No. 3, 335-354 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/1077800403009003001

The Unstructured Interactive Interview: Issues of Reciprocity and Risks when Dealing with Sensitive Topics

Juliet Corbin

University of Alberta

Janice M. Morse

University of Alberta

Qualitative research using unstructured interviews is frequently reviewed by institutional review boards using criteria developed for biomedical research. Unlike biomedical studies, unstructured interactive interviews provide participants considerable control over the interview process, thereby creating a different risk profile. This article examines the interview process and literature for evidence of benefit and harm. Although there is evidence that qualitative interviews may cause some emotional distress, there is no indication that this distress is any greater than in everyday life or that it requires follow-up counseling, although the authors acknowledge distress is always a possibility. Essential to preventing participant distress is the researcher's interviewing skills and a code of ethics. When research is conducted with sensitivity and guided by ethics, it becomes a process with benefits to both participants and researchers. The authors conclude that qualitative research using unstructured interviews poses no greater risk than everyday life and expedited reviews are sufficient.

Key Words: qualitative research • interviewing • risk • ethics


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Action ResearchHome page
S. Maiter, L. Simich, N. Jacobson, and J. Wise
Reciprocity: An ethic for community-based participatory action research
Action Research, September 1, 2008; 6(3): 305 - 325.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Qual Health ResHome page
C. Malacrida
Reflexive Journaling on Emotional Research Topics: Ethical Issues for Team Researchers
Qual Health Res, December 1, 2007; 17(10): 1329 - 1339.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Qualitative ResearchHome page
S. Mertkan-Ozunlu
Reflexive accounts about qualitative interviewing within the context of educational policy in North Cyprus
Qualitative Research, November 1, 2007; 7(4): 447 - 459.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Qualitative ResearchHome page
L. M. Brogden and D. Patterson
Nostalgia, goodness and ethical paradox
Qualitative Research, May 1, 2007; 7(2): 217 - 227.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Qual Health ResHome page
J. Giordano, M. O'Reilly, H. Taylor, and N. Dogra
Confidentiality and Autonomy: The Challenge(s) of Offering Research Participants a Choice of Disclosing Their Identity
Qual Health Res, February 1, 2007; 17(2): 264 - 275.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Chronic IllnessHome page
S. Conrad, L.E. Garrett, W.G.E. Cooksley, M.P. Dunne, and G.A. Macdonald
Living with chronic hepatitis C means `you just haven't got a normal life any more'
Chronic Illness, June 1, 2006; 2(2): 121 - 131.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Qual Health ResHome page
B. Gaglio, C. C. Nelson, and D. King
The role of rapport: lessons learned from conducting research in a primary care setting.
Qual Health Res, May 1, 2006; 16(5): 723 - 734.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Qualitative Social WorkHome page
N. Cooper and S. Burnett
Using Discursive Reflexivity to Enhance the Qualitative Research Process: An Example from Accounts of Teenage Conception
Qualitative Social Work, March 1, 2006; 5(1): 111 - 129.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Qualitative InquiryHome page
G. Enosh and E. Buchbinder
The Interactive Construction of Narrative Styles in Sensitive Interviews: The Case of Domestic Violence Research
Qualitative Inquiry, August 1, 2005; 11(4): 588 - 617.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Qual Health ResHome page
J. L. Bottorff, C. Kalaw, J. L. Johnson, M. Stewart, and L. Greaves
Tobacco Use in Intimate Spaces: Issues in the Study of Couple Dynamics
Qual Health Res, April 1, 2005; 15(4): 564 - 577.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Qual Health ResHome page
J. M. Morse
A Review Committee's Guide for Evaluating Qualitative Proposals
Qual Health Res, July 1, 2003; 13(6): 833 - 851.
[Abstract] [PDF]