This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Murphy, P. D. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Anthropologist’s Son (or, Living and Learning the Field)

Southern Illinois University

Behar asserts that any story worth telling calls on us to explore and expose our own cultural biography. Reflecting on my relationship with my father, an anthropologist, and my experiences in Mexico, I draw on my own cultural biography to argue for the continuing importance of "the field." Throughout my life, my father’s approach to ethnography has generated important ethnographic lessons while also conflicting with much of the current discourse around the production and politics of ethnography. While in Mexico this past spring, I wrote to wrestle through the tensions and disjunctures of my experiences with him, with ethnography, with theory and practice. The context of Mexico for this self-archeology was much more than a simple backdrop for experience as it forced me to work through these contradictions. What I present here exposes that process, foregrounding how the embodied experience of fieldwork remains essential to the contribution and relevance of ethnographic knowledge.

Qualitative Inquiry, Vol. 8, No. 2, 246-261 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/10778004008002023


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Crang Qualitative methods: touchy, feely, look-see? Progress in Human Geography, August 1, 2003; 27(4): 494 - 504. [PDF]