Qualitative Inquiry

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Duncan, G. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Qualitative Inquiry, Vol. 8, No. 1, 85-104 (2002)

Critical Race Theory and Method: Rendering Race in Urban Ethnographic Research

Garrett Albert Duncan

Syracuse University

North American critical race theorists maintain race is a central feature in the social and economic organization of the United States. Rather than describing an objective reality or a psychological operation, according to these theorists, race is best understood as power relationships that define dominant and subjugated positions in society. In this article, the author situates a discussion of the theoretical and practical applications of critical race theory in ethnographic methodology within an analysis of its usefulness in rendering visible racialized relationships that researchers take for granted. Specifically, he analyzes data, generated during a 3-year period, to explicate how these relationships play out in a qualitative methods course at a large Midwest research university with an urban elementary educational facility field site. This analysis renders the mechanisms of race explicit in ways to subject them to critique and to lay foundations for alternative ways to imagine and do qualitative research.

Key Words: race • ethnography • urban • pedagogy


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Qualitative InquiryHome page
R. M. Boylorn
E Pluribus Unum (Out of Many, One)
Qualitative Inquiry, August 1, 2006; 12(4): 651 - 680.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
REVIEW OF RESEARCH IN EDUCATIONHome page
T. J. Yosso, L. Parker, D. G. Solorzano, and M. Lynn
Chapter 1: From Jim Crow to Affirmative Action and Back Again: A Critical Race Discussion of Racialized Rationales and Access to Higher Education
Review of Research in Education, January 1, 2004; 28(1): 1 - 25.
[PDF]


Home page
Am Educ Res JHome page
J. E. Morris
Can Anything Good Come From Nazareth? Race, Class, and African American Schooling and Community in the Urban South and Midwest
American Educational Research Journal, January 1, 2004; 41(1): 69 - 112.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational Administration QuarterlyHome page
G. R. Lopez
The (Racially Neutral) Politics of Education: A Critical Race Theory Perspective
Educational Administration Quarterly, February 1, 2003; 39(1): 68 - 94.
[Abstract] [PDF]