Qualitative Inquiry

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Richardson, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Qualitative Inquiry, Vol. 6, No. 2, 253-255 (2000)

Evaluating Ethnography

Laurel Richardson

The Ohio State University

With full awareness that criteria are mutable, the author argues that ethnography needs to be evaluated through two lenses: science and arts. The author suggests five criteria: substantive contribution, aesthetic merit, reflexivity, impact, and expression of a reality.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Organizational Research MethodsHome page
J. M. Amis and M. L. Silk
The Philosophy and Politics of Quality in Qualitative Organizational Research
Organizational Research Methods, July 1, 2008; 11(3): 456 - 480.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Cultural Studies <=> Critical MethodologiesHome page
D. Pollock
The Performative "I"
Cultural Studies <=> Critical Methodologies, August 1, 2007; 7(3): 239 - 255.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Qualitative InquiryHome page
S. L. Faulkner
Concern With Craft: Using Ars Poetica as Criteria for Reading Research Poetry
Qualitative Inquiry, March 1, 2007; 13(2): 218 - 234.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHERHome page
M. Freeman, K. deMarrais, J. Preissle, K. Roulston, and E. A. St. Pierre
Standards of Evidence in Qualitative Research: An Incitement to Discourse
Educational Researcher, January 1, 2007; 36(1): 25 - 32.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Qualitative InquiryHome page
K. Medford
Caught With a Fake ID: Ethical Questions About Slippage in Autoethnography
Qualitative Inquiry, October 1, 2006; 12(5): 853 - 864.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Qualitative InquiryHome page
C. N. Poulos
The Ties That Bind Us, the Shadows That Separate Us: Life and Death, Shadow and (Dream)Story
Qualitative Inquiry, February 1, 2006; 12(1): 96 - 117.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Qualitative InquiryHome page
M. Humphreys
Getting Personal: Reflexivity and Autoethnographic Vignettes
Qualitative Inquiry, December 1, 2005; 11(6): 840 - 860.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Qualitative ResearchHome page
N. K. Denzin
Reading and Writing Performance
Qualitative Research, August 1, 2003; 3(2): 243 - 268.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Qualitative InquiryHome page
S. Finley
Arts-Based Inquiry in QI: Seven Years From Crisis to Guerrilla Warfare
Qualitative Inquiry, April 1, 2003; 9(2): 281 - 296.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Contemporary EthnographyHome page
B. S. GREEN
Learning from Henry Mayhew: The Role of the Impartial Spectator in Mayhew's London Labour and the London Poor
Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, April 1, 2002; 31(2): 99 - 134.
[Abstract] [PDF]