Qualitative Inquiry

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goodley, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Qualitative Inquiry, Vol. 5, No. 1, 24-46 (1999)

Disability Research and the "Researcher Template": Reflections on Grounded Subjectivity in Ethnographic Research

Dan Goodley

Bolton Institute

This article examines methodological and analytical issues emerging from an ethnographic study of self-advocacy groups of people with learning difficulties. Running in parallel to this research was the author's involvement as a volunteer supporter to a self-advocacy group. This article explores how these two experiences connected to create a "researcher template." This template provided a working subjective framework through which to control, temper, assess, and check observations and analyses while inviting a consideration of the dialectical interplay between epistemology, methodology, and analysis. Four points are considered: (a) the grounding of researcher subjectivity in relation to "knowing" research participants, (b) the impact of the author's volunteer role on his subjectivity during ethnography, (c) the dilemmas of participating in people's lives, and (d) the relationships between ethnography and participatory and emancipatory disability research. It concludes that explicitly rendering a researcher's subjectivity open to critical revision feeds into the development of critical reflexivity within disability research.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Intellect DisabilHome page
L. Schoeters, P. Schelfhout, G. Roets, G. Van Hove, L. Townson, R. Chapman, and I. Buchanan
Partnership working between university researchers and self-advocacy organizations: 'A way forward for inclusion?'in England and 'Fine feathers make a fine bird'in Flanders
J Intellect Disabil., December 1, 2005; 9(4): 345 - 357.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Intellect DisabilHome page
R. Northway
Ending Participatory Research?
J Intellect Disabil., March 1, 2000; 4(1): 27 - 36.
[Abstract] [PDF]