Qualitative Inquiry

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fine, M.
Right arrow Articles by Weis, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Qualitative Inquiry, Vol. 2, No. 3, 251-274 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/107780049600200301

Writing the "Wrongs" of Fieldwork: Confronting Our Own Research/ Writing Dilemmas in Urban Ethnographies

Michelle Fine

CUNY Graduate School

Lois Weis

SUNY, Buffalo

Inspired by Laurel Richardson's (1995) call for "writing stories," the authors of this essay struggle with how to produce scholarly texts drawn from narratives of over 150 poor and working-class men and women—White, African American, Latino, and Asian American. They unveil a set of knotty, emergent ethical and rhetorical dilemmas they have encountered in their attempt to write for, with, and about poor and working-class informants at a time when their lives and moralities are routinely maligned in thepopular media; when the very problematic policies that may once have "assisted" them are being abandoned; and when the leverage of and audience for progressive social researchers and policy makers has grown foggy, and weak in the knees. Writing with a desire to create a conversation about ethics, writing, and qualitative research, the authors worry about the contemporary role of qualitative social researchers.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Qualitative InquiryHome page
S. Tilley and L. Gormley
Canadian University Ethics Review: Cultural Complications Translating Principles Into Practice
Qualitative Inquiry, April 1, 2007; 13(3): 368 - 387.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The Counseling PsychologistHome page
P. Arredondo and P. Perez
Expanding Multicultural Competence through Social Justice Leadership
The Counseling Psychologist, May 1, 2003; 31(3): 282 - 289.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHERHome page
J. Kaomea
Reading Erasures and Making the Familiar Strange: Defamiliarizing Methods for Research in Formerly Colonized and Historically Oppressed Communities
Educational Researcher, March 1, 2003; 32(2): 14 - 23.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Behavioral ScientistHome page
J. VEROFF and A. DiSTEFANO
Researching Across Difference: A Reprise
American Behavioral Scientist, April 1, 2002; 45(8): 1297 - 1307.
[PDF]


Home page
Qualitative InquiryHome page
K. Schultz
Crossing Boundaries in Research and Teacher Education: Reflections of a White Researcher in Urban Schools and Communities
Qualitative Inquiry, December 1, 1997; 3(4): 491 - 512.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Qualitative InquiryHome page
P. Ulichny
When Critical Ethnography and Action Collide
Qualitative Inquiry, June 1, 1997; 3(2): 139 - 168.
[Abstract] [PDF]