This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by O'Connor, M. K. Articles by Thomas, M. L. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Grounded Theory

Managing the Challenge for Those Facing Institutional Review Board Oversight

Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond

F. Ellen Netting

Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond

M. Lori Thomas

Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond

The authors examine one of the earliest systematic forms of qualitative inquiry to identify some of the boundaries needed in grounded theory designs to provide a small corner of clarity in the discourse about what is acceptable science from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) perspective. Beginning with an overview of grounded theory research as it was originally conceived and extended, the challenges for establishment of a uniform standard are put forth. Within this background and context, the authors report the results of a content analysis of a sampling of dissertation abstracts claiming to use grounded theory. Results reveal the need to clarify standards for different types of grounded theory research to help those facing IRB oversight. The authors assert that there are two useful sets of standards that should be applied to the assessment of the quality of a grounded theory design and researchers should not confuse the two.

Key Words: grounded theory • Institutional Review Board • qualitative research standards

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?