This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by patterson, d. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Research Ethics Boards as Spaces of Marginalization

A Canadian Story

University of Regina, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada, donna.patterson{at}uregina.ca

This article complicates how Canadian universities are pressured to capitalize on research and how these same pressures affect both the collaborative and community-based research within the academy by privileging one type of research and relationships within community over others. Through examining historical influences on Research Ethics Boards in Canada, ways these pressures shape qualitative research and disturb how and what we know, as well as what can be known about who and how we work move in and out of focus. Questions are raised about living ethically as qualitative researchers within an institutional context.

Key Words: qualitative research • ethics • dialogue of divergence • Canadian University Research Ethics Boards

Qualitative Inquiry, Vol. 14, No. 1, 18-27 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/1077800407308915


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?