Qualitative Inquiry

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kvale, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Qualitative Inquiry, Vol. 12, No. 3, 480-500 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1077800406286235

Dominance Through Interviews and Dialogues

Steinar Kvale

University of Aarhus, Denmark

The article discusses common conceptions of interviews as dialogues and the extensive application of qualitative research interviews in a consumer society. In the first part, an understanding of research interviews as warm, caring, and empowering dialogues is questioned by highlighting power asymmetries in interview relationships. Agonistic interview techniques, which play on contradictions and power differences, are outlined. The second part of the article points to the prevalence of dialogues as exercises of power in politics, management, and education. The third part outlines the interview production of knowledge for consumption in a postmodern society. The article concludes that recognition of power dynamics by the social construction of knowledge in interviews is necessary to ascertain objectivity and ethicality of interview research.

Key Words: interview • dialogue • agonistics • power • management • consumption • ethics


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Qual Health ResHome page
S. M. Carter, C. F. C. Jordens, C. McGrath, and M. Little
You Have to Make Something of All That Rubbish, Do You? An Empirical Investigation of the Social Process of Qualitative Research
Qual Health Res, September 1, 2008; 18(9): 1264 - 1276.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Health ResHome page
K. Cook and K. Nunkoosing
Maintaining Dignity and Managing Stigma in the Interview Encounter: The Challenge of Paid-For Participation
Qual Health Res, March 1, 2008; 18(3): 418 - 427.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Journal of Men's HealthHome page
T. H. Andersen
Speaking About the Unspeakable: Sexually Abused Men Striving Toward Language
American Journal of Men's Health, March 1, 2008; 2(1): 25 - 36.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Qualitative InquiryHome page
S. Brinkmann
Could Interviews Be Epistemic?: An Alternative to Qualitative Opinion Polling
Qualitative Inquiry, November 1, 2007; 13(8): 1116 - 1138.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Qualitative InquiryHome page
L. Tanggaard
The Research Interview as Discourses Crossing Swords: The Researcher and Apprentice on Crossing Roads
Qualitative Inquiry, January 1, 2007; 13(1): 160 - 176.
[Abstract] [PDF]