This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Weinstein, M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Randomized Design and the Myth of Certain Knowledge: Guinea Pig Narratives and Cultural Critique

Kent State University

The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB) has explicitly promoted randomized research designs and implicitly promoted clinical trials as the only legitimate educational science. In doing so, the law seeks to remodel educational research in a medical mode. This article draws on the narrative of a human subject participating in a medical randomized experiment to raise questions about the extent to which such designs secure the goals NCLB claims they will: validity, rigor, replicability. In contrasting the narrative of science in NCLB and the narrative of science as told by human subjects, the author draws on de Certeau as well as Bowker and Star to make sense of the difference in structure of the narratives and to highlight the extent to which randomized designs are mythologized in the law and current debates over methodology.

Key Words: clinical trials • No Child Left Behind Act • narrative • qualitative research • human subjects

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. S. Cannella and Y. S. Lincoln Predatory vs. Dialogic Ethics: Constructing an Illusion or Ethical Practice as the Core of Research Methods Qualitative Inquiry, April 1, 2007; 13(3): 315 - 335. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. K. Denzin The First International Congress of Qualitative Inquiry Qualitative Social Work, March 1, 2005; 4(1): 105 - 111. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. S. Cannella Regulatory Power: Can a Feminist Poststructuralist Engage in Research Oversight? Qualitative Inquiry, April 1, 2004; 10(2): 235 - 245. [Abstract] [PDF]