Qualitative Inquiry

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here for more information on The Virtual Advisor

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lincoln, Y. S.
Right arrow Articles by Cannella, G. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Qualitative Inquiry, Vol. 10, No. 2, 175-201 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/1077800403262373

Qualitative Research, Power, and the Radical Right

Yvonna S. Lincoln

Texas A&M University

Gaile S. Cannella

Texas A&M University

Recent legislative and executive orders that mandate preferred methods for evaluating the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 signal a much larger movement in the social sciences. Attacks stemming from the "culture wars" of the 1990s have spread to forms of research labeled "unscientific," including postmodern research and qualitative research. Examination of the sources of the attacks reveals a wide network of new and recent foundations with decidedly right-wing political views, the establishment and growing power of the National Association of Scholars, and other well-funded efforts to discredit research that uncovers and exposes deep inequities in social life and schooling on gender, race, social class, religion, and/or sexual orientation. Each of these well-funded sources of attack is discussed and the agenda of each is dissected.

Key Words: qualitative research • right-wing politics • power


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHERHome page
Y. Y. J. Woo
Engaging New Audiences: Translating Research Into Popular Media
Educational Researcher, August 1, 2008; 37(6): 321 - 329.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cultural Studies <=> Critical MethodologiesHome page
G. S. Cannella and L. L. Miller
Constructing Corporatist Science: Reconstituting the Soul of American Higher Education
Cultural Studies <=> Critical Methodologies, February 1, 2008; 8(1): 24 - 38.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Qualitative InquiryHome page
K. Bhattacharya
Consenting to the Consent Form: What Are the Fixed and Fluid Understandings Between the Researcher and the Researched?
Qualitative Inquiry, November 1, 2007; 13(8): 1095 - 1115.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Qualitative InquiryHome page
M. Y. Eryaman
Traveling Beyond Dangerous Private and Universal Discourses: Radioactivity of Radical Hermeneutics and Objectivism in Educational Research
Qualitative Inquiry, December 1, 2006; 12(6): 1198 - 1219.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Qualitative Social WorkHome page
N. K. Denzin
The First International Congress of Qualitative Inquiry
Qualitative Social Work, March 1, 2005; 4(1): 105 - 111.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Qualitative InquiryHome page
G. S. Cannella
Regulatory Power: Can a Feminist Poststructuralist Engage in Research Oversight?
Qualitative Inquiry, April 1, 2004; 10(2): 235 - 245.
[Abstract] [PDF]