This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Hertz, R. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Separate But Simultaneous Interviewing of Husbands and Wives: Making Sense of Their Stories

Wellesley College

This article argues that separate interviews with spouses can provide valuable insights on marital decision making. The notion that one partner can speak for both needs to be abandoned. However, in the process of including unrepresented family voices, making sense of multiple accounts becomes problematic. Multiple accounts of marriage are told when a researcher interviews husbands and wives on the process of decision making. Some differences in spouses' accounts arise from their division of labor, where one spouse knows more than the other. Other differences in accounts result from a division of labor in storytelling where the partners support each other in joint and individual perfor mances of telling. However, some differences in accounts render the researcher's analytic tasks far more complex when two stories, not one, are told. Finally, the account that ultimately becomes the written version needs to be better understood as a shifting construct of separate interviews with both spouses and how the researcher both interacts with respondents during the interview and analyzes the interview text.

Qualitative Inquiry, Vol. 1, No. 4, 429-451 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/107780049500100404


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. F. Zipp, A. Prohaska, and M. Bemiller Wives, Husbands, and Hidden Power in Marriage Journal of Family Issues, October 1, 2004; 25(7): 933 - 958. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. R. Boeije And Then There Were Three: Self-Presentational Styles and the Presence of the Partner as a Third Person in the Interview Field Methods, February 1, 2004; 16(1): 3 - 22. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Paterson and S. Scott-Findlay Critical Issues in Interviewing People with Traumatic Brain Injury Qual Health Res, March 1, 2002; 12(3): 399 - 409. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Berger Inside Out: Narrative Autoethnography as a Path Toward Rapport Qualitative Inquiry, August 1, 2001; 7(4): 504 - 518. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. M. Ortiz How Interviewing Became Therapy for Wives of Professional Athletes: Learning From a Serendipitous Experience Qualitative Inquiry, April 1, 2001; 7(2): 192 - 220. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. E. O'Rourke and B. B. Germino From Two Perspectives to One Choice: Blending Couple and Individual Views of Prostate Cancer Treatment Selection Journal of Family Nursing, August 1, 2000; 6(3): 231 - 251. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. F. Gilgun Fingernails Painted Red: A Feminist, Semiotic Analysis of a "Hot" Text Qualitative Inquiry, June 1, 1999; 5(2): 181 - 207. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. F. Knapp Interviewing Joshua: On the Importance of Leaving Room for Serendipity Qualitative Inquiry, September 1, 1997; 3(3): 326 - 342. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. HERTZ A Typology of Approaches to Child Care: The Centerpiece of Organizing Family Life For Dual-Earner Couples Journal of Family Issues, July 1, 1997; 18(4): 355 - 385. [Abstract]

				R. HERTZ GUARDING AGAINST WOMEN?: Responses of Military Men and Their Wives to Gender Integration Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, July 1, 1996; 25(2): 251 - 284. [Abstract]