Qualitative Inquiry

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tierney, W. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Qualitative Inquiry, Vol. 1, No. 4, 379-390 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/107780049500100401

(Re)Presentation and Voice

William G. Tierney

University of Southern California

This article considers the accessibility of language in scholarly work and discusses what makes a work boring and what the implications are for those who have a broad range of inquiry. In particular, the author discusses the development of the text in qualitative research and the struggles authors face as qualitative researchers. The author first considers the role of the author in the text and he then takes up the issue of readership. He subsequently discusses the relationship between the researched and the researcher and offers avenues for further consideration.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Qualitative InquiryHome page
D. Mahoney
Constructing Reflexive Fieldwork Relationships: Narrating My Collaborative Storytelling Methodology
Qualitative Inquiry, May 1, 2007; 13(4): 573 - 594.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Early Childhood ResearchHome page
P. Selbie and P. Clough
talking early childhood education: fictional enquiry with historical figures
Journal of Early Childhood Research, June 1, 2005; 3(2): 115 - 126.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Qual Health ResHome page
M. Sandelowski
Using Qualitative Research
Qual Health Res, December 1, 2004; 14(10): 1366 - 1386.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Qualitative InquiryHome page
C. E. Kiesinger
From Interview to Story: Writing Abbie's Life
Qualitative Inquiry, March 1, 1998; 4(1): 71 - 95.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Qualitative InquiryHome page
K. Daly
Re-Placing Theory in Ethnography: A Postmodern View
Qualitative Inquiry, September 1, 1997; 3(3): 343 - 365.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Qualitative InquiryHome page
T. McGettigan
Uncorrected Insight: Metaphor and Transcendence "After Truth" in Qualitative Inquiry
Qualitative Inquiry, September 1, 1997; 3(3): 366 - 383.
[Abstract] [PDF]